In the first episode of Mindhunter, the Netflix show about how the FBI serial killer program began, an interesting proposition was presented. The gist is that prior to the 1970s, crime had motive. In the contemporary era, however, motive was no longer a factor. Serial killers may have a modus operandi, and even a purpose, but they essentially kill indiscriminately. Random people become targets. Of course, this is a fictional story, but does that make the point any less relevant?
We may understand a killer has a motive, such as creating fear or terror, but there is no motive for target selection. Consider the most recent case of the Las Vegas shooting. As of this writing, a full month has passed and no one knows what motivated Stephen Paddock to shoot 500 people. Many terror attacks are on large groups of people, but none involve a personal motive.
Gone are the days of organized crime when gangsters wanted to “send a message” by killing a rival or snitch. No longer must a woman die because she was cheating on her husband. Being in the wrong place at the wrong time is as dangerous as infidelity in today’s world. When did this change?
I will once again point my finger at what I have termed “the Satanic Era” of the 1960s. Prior to the 1960s, the majority of mass killings were familicide. Since the 1960s, mass killings have been in public places against innocent bystanders. The deadliest decade prior to 1960 was the 30s, with 9 mass shootings. The 1960s had 6, the 70s had 13, there were 32 in the 1980s, and over 40 in the 1990s. The number since then as only increased.
Again, low numbers of mass shootings which primarily were targeted at family members prior to the 60s. Much higher frequency of shootings with a major increase in bystander fatalities since the 1960s.
How about serial killers, the focus of Mindhunter? According to one site, there were only a dozen or so serial killers in the United States in the decades leading up to the 1960s. There were 19 in the 1960s, 119 in the 70s, 200 in the 80s, and 141 in the 1990s. The number has since dropped to 60 or less in the twenty-first century, but the line drawn through the Satanic Era is still worth noting.
It does appear that this notion of random killing has increased since the 1960s.
17,000 women were forcibly raped in 1960. By the end of the decade, the number of victims had more than doubled. By 1992, the number peaked at over 109,000.
Recreational drug and alcohol use, though prevalent regardless of drug laws, has exploded since the 1960s.
Increases in violence against strangers, depictions of violence and sex in film and television, sexual assault, drug use, alcoholism, the opioid crisis, teen pregnancies, deviant sexual behaviors, homosexuality, transgenderism, mass murder, and serial killings are directly correlated with the decline in major religion and distrust of major media and government institutions.
In every single one of these categories – religious decline (secularization), increases in crime and deviance, the birth of new religious movements and serial killers – you can draw a line before and after the Satanic Era of the 1960s and see that there has been a seismic social shift in the United States.
One cannot help but notice that many of the same issues of the 1960s are manifest today. Civil unrest, shouts of racism, segregation, unending protest, free love, excessive drug use, sensitivity toward anything deemed “offensive”, attacks on free speech and the Constitution, militarized police, political corruption, calls for revolution, Marxism, and the list goes on and on.
I am a child of the 80s, but I would love to hear from those who were alive during the 60s. Does your lived experience mirror my theory? Has the shift been noticeable? Do you think there has actually been a shift? Please, I want to hear from you.
6 thoughts on “The Satanic Era”
Yes there has been a shift. I grew up in the 50’s and 60’s. I my mind the change started November 23, 1963. The assassination of JFK. That’s when I saw things going south…Faith in government, faith in law enforcement, and faith in God hit the skids on that fateful day and has been getting worse with each generation.
Interesting analysis, Leon. I’ll have to take a closer look at the timelines to see how closely they align with Kennedy’s assassination. His death coincides with the ongoing travesty of Vietnam though. I wonder if the Kennedy murder is more of a symptom of the disease brought about by the Vietnam War, along with protests, “free love”, Woodstock, etc., than the catalyst.
As an observer of that era it seems to me – again that’s 50+ years ago – the protests didn’t start until later….I think the protests didn’t start until LBJ committed more troops….Woodstock was in 1969… My memory could be off however…
Yes, Woodstock was in ’69, but the “Era” would include all of it. I just looked it up and the protests began in 1964, but peaked in 1968. You may be on to something with Kennedy. His assassination may have very well been the “Franz Ferdinand moment” that kicked everything off. I know the Cold War and Cuban Missile Crisis preceded his death. What was the mood of the country during that period? I am assuming it was not nearly as divisive as after 1963.
As I recall folks were more curious than afraid. Kennedy really hadn’t been tested’ so we didn’t know what to expect. I don’t think people really knew how serious it really was.
Why is this shoeing up again?
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone